Date of publication: 2017-09-03 19:31
Whilst interviewing Richard Dawkins, Jonathan Miller asked him, &ldquo to give a summary of the most persuasive version&rdquo . The response was, in part,
&ldquo In short, the modern revolutionist, being an infinite sceptic, is always engaged in undermining his own mines. In his book on politics he attacks men for trampling on morality in his book on ethics he attacks morality for trampling on men.
This article was posted June 66 7559, so the opportunity for submitting comments for posting has long since passed. Note that some substantive, reasoned comments by defenders of atheism have appeared as weekend feedback. See, for example, Stereotyping atheists? Readers can still submit feedback, which will be responded to and passed to the author.
Generally, as popularized by the New Atheist movement, atheists prefer the definition of &ldquo atheism&rdquo as &ldquo lacking belief in god(s)&rdquo . Thus, by applying the term &ldquo atheist&rdquo to themselves, such atheists are not technically making a statement about God&rsquo s existence or lack thereof.
A chronological pattern of organization arranges information according to a progression of time, either forward or backward. When a topic is best understood in terms of different segments of time, a chronological format works well. For example, topics of an historical nature are best organized using this pattern.
Yet, biblically and philosophically a third option is that God wants to abolish evil and can, yet He functions on his own timing and He has not done it yet because He has a higher purpose in allowing evil to persist for a time.
&ldquo I am convinced that the battle for humankind&rsquo s future must be waged and won in the public school classroom by teachers who correctly perceive their role as the proselytizers of a new faith: a religion of humanity that recognizes and respects what theologians call divinity in every human being.
In Chapter 8 of Book I Aristotle says that since we have been talking about household possessions such as slaves we might as well continue this discussion. The discussion turns to "expertise in household management." The Greek word for "household" is oikos, and it is the source of our word "economics." In Aristotle's day almost all productive labor took place within the household, unlike today, in modern capitalist societies, when it mostly takes place in factories, offices, and other places specifically developed for such activity.
This pattern organizes information about a topic by dividing it up into its "good" and "bad" parts, or pro's and con's. It is effective to use when a writer wishes to objectively discuss both sides of an issue without taking a persuasive stance. This allows the reader to weigh both sides of an issue. As with the compare-contrast pattern, there are a number of possible variations to an advantages-disadvantages pattern. The simplest form of this pattern is shown below.
The use of a flashback is to convey to the readers information regarding the character’s background and give them an idea of the characters motives for doing certain things later in the story. Therefore, a flashback in the story deepens inner conflict. It provides stimulus for the conflict, deepens the touching effects and allows the reader to sympathize even with the villain.
&ldquo Had it not been for the rise of the literal interpretation of the Bible and the subsequent appropriation of biblical narratives by early modern scientists, modern science may not have arisen at all. In sum, the Bible and its literal interpretation have played a vital role in the development of Western science.&rdquo 76
Richard Dawkins made similar claims whilst lecturing to children during his &ldquo Royal Institution Christmas Lectures&rdquo aka &ldquo The Royal Institution Lectures for Children&rdquo Episode 6, &ldquo Waking up in the Universe&rdquo ( video ) when he stated:
For example, suppose a writer wished to describe various types of wine. One way to outline this information would be to divide the type of wine by its color, as shown in example one. A second way would be to divide the types of wine by the region in which they were made, as shown in example two.
Rather, the atheist considers what is and what is not, what does and does not occur and only then makes statements as to what God would or should do, knowing that those things do not occur (this is all generally speaking since, for example, the atheist would claim that God does not perform miracles even though God does so).